US Supreme Court Justice Thinks Kim K’s Jewelry Heist May Be A Fraud





Kim Kardashian’s Paris jewelry heist is beginning to raise a lot of eyebrows. Yesterday, a US Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer brought up the robbery during a hearing.

According to TMZ, Breyer was hearing a case about a California man who drained someone’s bank account but insisted it wasn’t a fraud because the bank’s money is insured.

“Even Kardashian’s thief, if there is one, believes that all that jewelry is insured. So, it’s not theft?” The justice replied, and even went on to make a joke about the reality TV star’s stolen jewelry being on loan, and not hers at all.

And the Supreme Court Justice isn’t alone.

Yesterday, the Paris police announced that it couldn’t find any footage to support the heist, and NY Daily News says the heist claim is “too good to be true.”

OUCH.

This doesn’t feel like a heist. It feels like a plot twist for a season premiere. Why did West stop his concert mid-rap, citing a “family emergency,” yet not rush to Paris to be with his distraught wife?” 

The report continues, alleging that the ‘heist’ will possibly feature in a new episode of Keeping Up With The Kardashians.

What do you think?






Comments